Case 1310353/2020 · Employment Tribunal
not in attendance For the v Written — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310353/2020
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Appearance
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
not in attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 19 April 2021 before Employment Judge Dean at Birmingham. The claimant, Mr Rizwan Patel, was not in attendance and had asked by email and telephone for the hearing to be postponed because his mother had been taken into hospital on 17 April 2021. He said he was still at Coventry Hospital, that his mother had a heart condition and had tested positive for Covid, and that he could not leave because his wife did not speak English and his brother, who did speak English, was fasting and not fit to attend the hospital.
The tribunal refused the postponement application. It noted that the claimant had provided no medical evidence to support the request, either as to his own inability to attend or as to any inability on the part of his brother to accompany their mother. The judge also took account of the history of the litigation, including earlier unsuccessful adjournment applications, and found that the claimant was aware of the need to provide medical information when seeking a postponement. The tribunal considered the claimant could have made arrangements for another family member to attend the hospital and noted that he had had the bundle since 24 March 2021.
The judge concluded that, applying the balance of convenience and the overriding objective, it was right to refuse the latest postponement request. The hearing was to continue in the claimant's absence, subject to any later application to review the decision if additional medical information were provided. This judgment does not record any determination of the underlying disability discrimination or unfair dismissal claims, and it contains no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment is a preliminary hearing on the claimant's application to postpone the hearing. It does not determine the underlying disability discrimination or unfair dismissal claims on the merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Presidential Guidance (2013)
- overriding objective
- balance of convenience
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.