Case 1310380/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Clements v Haddie & Trilby Limited Heard: Midlands West (by Cloud Video Platform) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310380/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Clements
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Clements brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Haddie & Trilby Limited. The respondent did not attend the hearing, which was held by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Power sitting alone on 5 June 2023.
The tribunal held that the complaint was well founded and succeeded. It found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,120 to the claimant, calculated as 112 hours at £10 per hour. It also ordered the respondent to make the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance contributions before payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of £1,120, calculated as 112 hours at £10 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,120
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.