Case 1310647/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr W. Hawkeswood – Company Representative — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310647/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham via CVP on 2 March 2021 before Employment Judge Algazy QC. The claimant, Mr P. Cook, appeared in person and the respondent, Hawkmet Ltd, was represented by Mr W. Hawkeswood.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,375. The judgment does not set out any further breakdown of that sum, and no separate remedy components are identified in the text provided.
The holiday pay claim did not succeed. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, so no substantive finding on the merits of that claim is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent owed the claimant £2,375 on the breach of contract claim and ordered payment of that sum. | Upheld | — | £2,375 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,375
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.