Case 1310686/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McGahan v Paul Devlin Following a Hearing by Video (CVP) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310686/2020
- Decision date
- 26 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McGahan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 March 2021, Employment Judge J Jones determined the case at a hearing by video. The tribunal upheld Mr M McGahan's claim to unpaid wages and ordered the respondent, Paul Devlin, to pay £2,691, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if applicable.
The tribunal also upheld the claim to unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of £172.24, again subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if applicable. No further reasons were provided in the written record, and no separate remedy breakdown beyond the two sums awarded appears in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claim to unpaid wages succeeded and ordered payment of £2,691, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if applicable. | Upheld | — | £2,691 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim to unpaid holiday pay succeeded and ordered payment of £172.24, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance if applicable. | Upheld | — | £172 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,863
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.