Case 1310716/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Hill & Mrs Northall v Real Health Pain Management Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1310716/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Wright Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Hill & Mrs Northall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Birmingham via CVP on 20 September 2023, before Employment Judge K Wright, the claimants appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal dealt only with limitation. It found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimants to present their claims for unauthorised deduction of wages, breach of contract, notice pay and, for Mrs Northall only, holiday pay, within the original time limit.
The tribunal then found that the claims had been presented within a further reasonable period and extended time accordingly. Time was extended to 12 December 2022 in Mrs Hill's case (1310716/2022) and to 8 December 2022 in Mrs Northall's case (1309611/2022). The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and records no merits decision or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Procedural limitation ruling only. The tribunal held it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within time and extended time for Mrs Hill to 12 December 2022 and for Mrs Northall to 8 December 2022. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Procedural limitation ruling only. The judgment separately listed breach of contract claims and extended time on the same basis. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Notice pay was listed separately in the judgment. The tribunal extended time on the same basis and did not decide the merits. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Mrs Northall only. The tribunal extended time for the holiday pay claim on the same basis and did not decide the merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.