Case 1310719/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Mapianda v 101 Nightclub — 2025
- Case reference
- 1310719/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Mapianda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr E Mapianda's claim against 101 Nightclub. In a letter dated 3 June 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing by 17 June 2025, on why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Wedderspoon found that the claim had not been actively pursued and ordered that it be struck out.
The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim, and it does not record any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim in the extracted text. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 3 June 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.