Case 1310726/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Quinlivan v Legends Sandwich Shop Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 1310726/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Employer
- Panel members
- Mr I Morrison, Mr J Reeves
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Quinlivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss Quinlivan's complaint of unfair dismissal under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and upheld it. It also found that the complaint of pregnancy and/or maternity discrimination under s18 Equality Act 2010 was well founded and upheld it. The judgment records that a separate remedy hearing would be held in respect of those two claims.
The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was not well founded. The tribunal separately allowed a claim for notice pay and awarded £121.25, and it also allowed a claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay and awarded £266.75. The judgment does not record a combined total award or any remedy figure for the unfair dismissal and discrimination findings in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded. A separate remedy hearing was directed for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found the pregnancy and/or maternity discrimination complaint under s18 Equality Act 2010 well founded. A separate remedy hearing was directed for this claim. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal allowed the claim for notice pay and awarded £121.25. | Upheld | — | £121 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal allowed the claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay and awarded £266.75. | Upheld | — | £267 |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.