Case 1310731/2020 · Employment Tribunal

In person (with his mother, Mrs H Bagguley) For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 1310731/2020
Decision date: 5 March 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lloyd Appearances
Venue: Birmingham

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person (with his mother, Mrs H Bagguley) For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the remote preliminary hearing on 4 March 2021, Employment Judge Lloyd recorded that no response had been presented and that there had been no attendance or appearance by the respondent. The tribunal therefore entered default judgment under rule 21 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Mr A Bagguley, appearing in person with his mother, Mrs H Bagguley, succeeded only in the monetary claims identified in the judgment: holiday pay, pension contribution, unpaid wages/furlough, unpaid SSP, and notice pay.

The tribunal awarded £426.40 for holiday pay, £42.16 for pension contribution, £1,049.60 for unpaid wages/furlough, £249.21 for unpaid SSP, and £328.00 for notice pay, stating that the awards at paragraph (a) were gross figures. It also made a time preparation order under rule 75(2) for £500.00 payable by the respondent. The judgment records a total award of £2,595.37 comprising those sums, and it dismisses all other claims advanced by the claimant.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£426
Breach of contract	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£42
Unlawful deduction from wages	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£1,050
Other	The judgment lists this separately as unpaid SSP and does not identify the legal basis in the text.	Upheld	—	£249
Breach of contract	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£328
Other	The judgment states that all other claims advanced by the claimant were dismissed, without identifying them individually.	Dismissed	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £2,595; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.