Case 1310828/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan A. Davies v Farmers Fresh Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310828/2022
- Decision date
- 6 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan A. Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Alan A. Davies brought a claim against Farmers Fresh Limited for unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Power on 6 April 2023, considered two components of that claim arising from the period 27 November 2020 to 2 December 2022.
The first component concerned alleged overtime payments for time worked before the Claimant's morning shift start time. The tribunal held that this part of the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The second component concerned the calculation of holiday pay and whether the Claimant's early start and attendance allowances should have been included. That part of the claim succeeded. The Respondent admitted liability, accepted that £872 was owed, and the judgment records that a payment had already been made and accepted in discharge of that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim that the Respondent failed to make overtime payments for the period 27 November 2020 to 2 December 2022, relating to time worked before the Claimant's morning shift start time, was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim that the Respondent failed to include the Claimant's early start and attendance allowances in the calculation of holiday pay for the period 27 November 2020 to 2 December 2022 succeeded. The Respondent admitted liability, accepted that the sum owed was £872, and the judgment records that a payment had already been made and accepted in discharge of that sum. | Upheld | — | £872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £872
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £872
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.