Case 1310850/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Downes v Pro Repair Telford Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310850/2022
- Decision date
- 17 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Downes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. On that basis, the tribunal entered judgment without a contested hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 30 October 2023. The judgment was given by Employment Judge Dean Date on 17 February 2023.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,961.72 net, subject to deductions for income tax and national insurance contributions required by law. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,568.00.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,007.45. The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was recorded as £8,537.17, and the judgment noted that it was for the claimant to account for any tax and employee national insurance on the sums awarded, or to make any pension contributions to a pension provider.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as a net sum, subject to deductions for income tax and national insurance contributions required by law. | Upheld | — | £1,962 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £4,568 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £2,007 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,537
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.