Case 1310862/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Collier & Mr K Lloyd v Pro Repair Telford Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310862/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Collier & Mr K Lloyd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded in relation to the period 1 to 30 November 2022. It ordered payment of £1,666 to Mr Collier and £1,262.73 to Mr Lloyd, described as the gross sums deducted, with the claimants responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract claim for notice pay. It ordered £1,348 to each claimant as damages for breach of contract and recorded that the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimants would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay.
The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken when employment ended, and awarded £924 to Mr Collier and £1,402 to Mr Lloyd, again with tax or National Insurance to be handled by the claimants where applicable.
Finally, under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that Mr Collier was entitled to a redundancy payment of £962.50 and Mr Lloyd was entitled to £1,168. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 1-30 November 2022. The tribunal awarded £1,666 to Mr Collier and £1,262.73 to Mr Lloyd. | Upheld | — | £2,929 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for notice pay. The tribunal awarded £1,348 to each claimant, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax on post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,696 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim was well-founded because the respondent did not pay for accrued but untaken holiday when employment ended. The tribunal awarded £924 to Mr Collier and £1,402 to Mr Lloyd. | Upheld | — | £2,326 |
| Redundancy | Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that each claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment: £962.50 to Mr Collier and £1,168 to Mr Lloyd. | Upheld | — | £2,131 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,081
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.