Case 1310876/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1310876/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Appearance
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Birmingham on 11 and 12 May 2020, before Employment Judge Dean, the respondent applied for the claim to be struck out. The claimant, The Very Reverend Kosmas Pavlidis, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Meabh Mc Gee of counsel.
The tribunal granted the respondent's application and held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment records two bases for that decision: that the claim was an abuse of process such that the complaint was scandalous or vexatious, and that it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment does not set out the substantive factual background or identify the underlying cause or causes of action beyond referring to 'the claim'. It also records no monetary award or other remedy, because the claim was struck out in full.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.