Case 1310916/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T. Flint v R. Hand Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310916/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T. Flint
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham via CVP on 22 March 2023 before Employment Judge Algazy QC. The tribunal amended the respondent's name in the heading to R. Hand Ltd. Mr T. Flint attended in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R. Hand.
The tribunal declared that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay succeeded in the agreed sum of £789.91 gross. It ordered the respondent to pay that sum, net of deductions, to the claimant. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay succeeded in the agreed sum of £789.91 gross; the award was not split between the heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal declared that the claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay succeeded in the agreed sum of £789.91 gross; the award was not split between the heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £790
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.