Case 1310931/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Massey v DPD Group UK Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1310931/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Massey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 6 June 2023 at Midlands (West), heard via CVP, Employment Judge Camp recorded that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The claimant said during the hearing that he wished to withdraw his Employment Tribunal claim because it seemed he did not have the necessary employment status to be entitled to bring it in the Employment Tribunals.
The claimant also stated that he was bringing a similar claim, for discrimination and breach of contract, about the same facts and matters, in the County Court. The tribunal therefore recorded that the Employment Tribunal claim had come to an end in accordance with rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure. No judgment dismissing the claim was issued because rule 52(a) applied. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the pleaded ET claim heads in detail. It records that the claimant orally withdrew the Employment Tribunal claim after saying he did not appear to have the necessary employment status to bring it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.