Case 1311148/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Matthew Taylor v Bosch Thermotechnology Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1311148/2020
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Matthew Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a final hearing by CVP on 11 and 12 April 2022. The claimant, Mr Matthew Taylor, did not attend the hearing on 11 April 2022, did not contact the Tribunal or the respondent, and did not respond when the Tribunal emailed him.
The tribunal noted that Mr Taylor did not address the matters raised in its letter of 29 March 2022, including whether witness evidence had been exchanged, why it had not been exchanged if that was the position, and whether the bundle was agreed. It also found that the claimant had not exchanged witness statements with the respondent before the final hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim for non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders dated 13 May 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The hearing fixed for 11 and 12 April 2022 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with Tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.