Case 1311157/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1311157/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the claimant's application dated 15 September 2021 to amend his claim to add GMB Union as a second respondent and to add a disability discrimination claim. The application was refused under Rule 34 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal then struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the 2013 Rules as having no reasonable prospect of success. The written record gives no further reasoning, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim to add a claim for disability discrimination. It was not a final determination of liability. | Other | Disability | — |
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37 as having no reasonable prospect of success. The extracted text does not identify the underlying pleaded cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 34 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.