Case 1311281/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Horton v Birmingham Moseley Rugby Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1311281/2024
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Horton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had withdrawn specified allegations, including allegations about comments connected to race and an allegation that Michelle Jones had a criminal conviction. The judgment dismissed those allegations following withdrawal, noting that the claimant had advanced no reason why they should not be dismissed.
The judgment expressly states that it does not affect the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, pregnancy discrimination or victimisation, nor other matters identified in the case management orders that she intends to rely on as background to race discrimination complaints. No remedy, legal test, or substantive findings on those remaining complaints are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses specified allegations following withdrawal. It states that the claimant's remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, pregnancy discrimination and victimisation are not affected. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.