Case 1311313/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. Wilson v Rhenus Warehousing Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1311313/2024
- Decision date
- 11 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing considered limitation for the claimant's disability discrimination claim. The claimant said the claim concerned direct disability discrimination by association, relying on his wife's fibromyalgia and his son's autism, and that his constructive unfair dismissal allegation was brought as part of the discrimination complaint. He confirmed that he did not pursue a whistleblowing complaint.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had first presented a claim without an ACAS early conciliation certificate and had then been given clear instructions by the Tribunal about obtaining a certificate and re-presenting his claim. It accepted that the claimant had stress, a new job, and family responsibilities, but found that the delay was significant, had not been satisfactorily explained, and could have been avoided had he followed the guidance provided.
Balancing the relevant factors, including the absence of redress for the claimant if the claim did not proceed and the respondent having to face an out-of-time discrimination claim, the Tribunal concluded that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The disability discrimination claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant confirmed the claim was direct disability discrimination by association. The judgment dismissed the claim as out of time and found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
- Mensah v Royal College of Midwives
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Miller v Ministry of Justice
- Jones v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
- Owen v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.