Case 1311314/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Karamvand v Heartlands Fryers Limited (in liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1311314/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Karamvand
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the Respondent failed to present a Response within the relevant time limit. Neither party attended the hearing before Employment Judge Walker at Birmingham on 6 February 2025. The Tribunal found the claim for unfair dismissal well-founded and ordered a compensatory award of £12,492.56, calculated as estimated net weekly pay of £499.69 over 24 weeks plus £500 for loss of statutory employment rights. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 were applied, with the prescribed element being £12,492.56 over the period 26 May 2021 to 6 February 2025.
The claim for wrongful dismissal also succeeded, but no additional compensation was awarded because the compensatory award already covered the notice period. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was upheld in respect of unpaid holiday pay, with £3,360 awarded for the two-year period prior to the claim presented on 21 December 2020, in line with the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014. The breach of contract complaint concerning a contractual redundancy payment was well-founded but attracted no further award because the redundancy payment had already been settled in full by the RPS.
The Tribunal additionally found that the Respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began. Finding no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable, the Tribunal awarded four weeks' gross pay of £2,400 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total award of compensation was £18,252.56, of which £12,492.56 is subject to recoupment.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. Compensatory award calculated as estimated net weekly pay of £499.69 x 24 weeks + £500 for loss of statutory employment rights. | Upheld | — | £12,493 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Well-founded and succeeds; no additional award as the compensatory award for unfair dismissal includes compensation for the notice period. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions in respect of unpaid holiday pay over the period 25/03/2017 to 24/03/2021; award limited to the two-year period prior to presentation of the claim per the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014. Award made in respect of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,360 |
| Holiday pay | The unpaid holiday pay was adjudicated as an unauthorised deduction from wages; the £3,360 award is recorded under that claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract by failing to pay a contractual redundancy payment; well-founded. No compensation awarded as the redundancy payment was already settled in full by the RPS. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Listed on gov.uk under Redundancy. The judgment addresses redundancy only via the contractual redundancy payment, which was already settled in full by the Redundancy Payments Service; no separate statutory redundancy award was made. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,253
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,493
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 22 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.