Case 1311331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Jessica Plassard Aleksandra Mihneva Maria Raducanu Roxana Banceu v Belvar Life UK Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1311331/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jessica Plassard Aleksandra Mihneva Maria Raducanu Roxana Banceu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands West Employment Tribunals on 21 December 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal made a protective award in favour of each claimant. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days per employee, commencing on 22 September 2020. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal ordered a protected period of 90 days for each claimant commencing on 22 September 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.