Case 1311377/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Bromage v VA Technology Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1311377/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Bromage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Bromage’s claim of unfair dismissal against VA Technology Ltd succeeded. Employment Judge Miller heard the case at Birmingham by CVP on 21 and 22 September 2021 and gave oral reasons at the hearing. The tribunal awarded the claimant £40,515.06 in respect of the unfair dismissal claim.
The claimant’s separate claim that he had not been given notice, or had not been paid the correct notice pay on termination, was dismissed. The tribunal also found that he had been underpaid holiday pay, and it awarded him a gross sum of £652.95, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. No written reasons were issued unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded a lump sum of £40,515.06. | Upheld | — | £40,515 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice or correct notice pay in respect of termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Awarded a gross sum of £652.95, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £653 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £41,168
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.