Case 1311384/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Thomas v Globe Integrated Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1311384/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Monk
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 6 December 2021, the tribunal gave Ms Thomas an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with tribunal orders and had not actively pursued the matter. The reasons note that, as set out in the case management summary of the hearing on 3 December 2021, she had failed to comply with Employment Judge Monk's orders of 22 June 2021 requiring medical evidence and a statement related to her alleged disability.
The tribunal recorded that Ms Thomas had not corresponded with the tribunal or the respondent since some time before those orders were made, had not made any representations in writing or otherwise, and had not requested a hearing. It also noted that she failed to comply with the order to explain by 17 December 2021 why she had not attended the case management hearing on 3 December 2021 or provided any prior explanation for that non-attendance. The result was that the claim was struck out. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not adjudicate the merits of any underlying claim type; it strikes out the claim because of non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.