Case 1311686/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Kelly v Coventry College Academy — 2025
- Case reference
- 1311686/2024
- Decision date
- 3 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the respondent's name was changed to Coventry College because the tribunal recorded that as the correct name of the respondent.
The claimant's claims for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal failed and were dismissed. The claimant's claim for unpaid wages/unlawful deduction from wages succeeded because the tribunal found that one day's accrued but unpaid holiday pay was owed.
The respondent was ordered to pay GBP 92.15. The judgment records that the parties agreed this was the net sum owed for the unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the successful claim as unpaid wages/unlawful deduction from wages and states the sum owed was one day's accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £92 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £92
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.