Case 1315557/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Payak v Birmingham City Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1315557/2013
- Decision date
- 9 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Payak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs K Payak brought claims against Birmingham City Council. It does not set out the factual background, issues, or any findings on the merits of the claims.
The tribunal dismissed the proceedings following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant under rule 52. No remedy or monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the proceedings for these claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category and hint because the short judgment text does not describe the pleaded claims beyond referring to plural claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings for these claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category and hint because the short judgment text does not describe the pleaded claims beyond referring to plural claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.