Case 1400011/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jolly v Steve Bryan Developments Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard At - Southampton (By CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400011/2024
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Jolly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard at Southampton by CVP on 31 May 2024, Employment Judge Self determined the claims brought by Mr M Jolly against Steve Bryan Developments Limited. The tribunal found the claim of wrongful dismissal, relating to non-payment of full notice pay, to be well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £4,509.67.
The tribunal additionally made an award of two weeks' pay, £819.94, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the Respondent having been in breach of the duty under section 1(1) or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 at the time proceedings were commenced. A sum of £614.96, representing redundancy payment in excess of the Claimant's entitlement, was deducted from the sums awarded.
The claim for unpaid holiday pay was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The total sum payable under the Judgment was £4,714.65.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal claim relating to non-payment of full notice pay; tribunal found the claim well-founded. | Upheld | — | £4,510 |
| Breach of contract | Award of two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the Respondent having been in breach of the duty under section 1(1) or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (failure to provide written particulars of employment). | Upheld | — | £820 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,715
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 1(1) or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.