Case 1400012/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Gibbs v Simply Serve Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400012/2019
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oliver Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Gibbs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr T Gibbs was disabled at the material time by reason of a speech and language disorder. It recorded that the impairment affected verbal and written communication, including reading and writing.
This judgment was limited to that preliminary issue and did not determine the substantive discrimination complaint. The tribunal stated that the case would proceed to a full hearing already listed on 22, 23 and 24 January 2019.
No remedy or liability findings beyond the disability status decision were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that the claimant was disabled by virtue of a speech and language disorder at the material time, affecting verbal and written communication including reading and writing. No merits decision or remedy was recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.