Case 1400015/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Chrisopher Hagg (1400015/2021) Jeremy Hagg (1400016/2021) v Peter Vowles t/a P&V Minibuses — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400015/2021
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Chrisopher Hagg (1400015/2021) Jeremy Hagg (1400016/2021)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton on 19 November 2021, Employment Judge Salter heard the claims of Chrisopher Hagg and Jeremy Hagg against Peter Vowles t/a P&V Minibuses by CVP. The claimants were not represented and did not attend; the respondent was represented by Mr N. Henry, Legal Consultant.
The written judgment records only one substantive decision: the claimant's case for payment for accrued but untaken holiday pay failed and was dismissed. No separate findings of fact or detailed reasoning are set out in the written record.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the text supplied, no monetary award was made and no further remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant's case for payment for accrued but untaken holiday pay fails and is dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.