Case 1400017/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Jolliff v Mrs R Cross t/a Make Do and Mend — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400017/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Jolliff
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on 16 April 2019 in favour of Miss C Jolliff against Mrs R Cross t/a Make Do and Mend. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,417.64 gross.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £810.00. The hearing listed for 26 July 2019 was cancelled. No other claims, remedies, or legal tests were set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,418 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £810 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,228
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.