Case 1400018/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Wendy Reeves v The Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400018/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Wendy Reeves
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a reserved preliminary hearing judgment on whether the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 during the relevant period. The claimant relied on stress, anxiety and fibromyalgia in connection with disability discrimination complaints about a disciplinary procedure and dismissal appeal process.
The tribunal found that the claimant had proved disability by reason of fibromyalgia between 29 April 2023 and 29 September 2023. It accepted that fibromyalgia symptoms flared up in mid-2023, caused a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, and that the substantial adverse effects were recurring and likely to recur.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not proved disability by reason of anxiety/stress. It found that the substantial effects of stress/anxiety arose in mid-2023, had not lasted for 12 months, were not likely to last for 12 months, and had not been established as recurring or likely to recur. The disability discrimination claims could proceed based on fibromyalgia.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing judgment only. The tribunal decided that the claimant was disabled by reason of fibromyalgia between 29 April 2023 and 29 September 2023, but had not proved disability by reason of anxiety/stress. The underlying disability discrimination complaints were not adjudicated on liability or remedy and were stated to be able to proceed based on fibromyalgia. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect
- long-term
- likely to recur
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.