Case 1400021/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr LEE OLLIS v Bay Engineering Dorset Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400021/2021
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr LEE OLLIS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the Claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was well founded and upheld it, with reasons given orally at the hearing on 14/10/2021. The written record does not set out the detailed reasons, and it states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the relevant time limit.
The tribunal did not determine compensation at this hearing. It directed that compensation, including whether any award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 should be made, would be decided at a further hearing on 23/11/2021. It also directed the Claimant to provide a statement about his efforts to find new employment and losses, and the Respondent's solicitors to prepare the bundle for the adjourned hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and said reasons were given orally on 14/10/2021. Compensation, including any award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, was left to an adjourned hearing on 23/11/2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.