Case 1400024/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Sarol v Cheltenham Regency Hotel and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400024/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss F Sarol
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing in Bristol on 23 April 2020, before Employment Judge Livesey, the respondents did not attend and the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21. The claimant was represented by her mother. The Second and/or Third Respondents were found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and were ordered to pay £771.69 gross. They were also found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and were ordered to pay £1,039.48.
The disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary service to bring such a complaint under s.108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment also recorded that all remaining claims against the First Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Second and/or Third Respondents were ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £771.69; the judgment does not apportion liability between them. | Upheld | — | £772 |
| Holiday pay | The Second and/or Third Respondents were ordered to pay the claimant £1,039.48 for unpaid holiday entitlement; the judgment does not apportion liability between them. | Upheld | — | £1,039 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under s.108 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment stated that all remaining claims against the First Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal; the extracted text does not identify those claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,811
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.