Case 1400025/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Silveira v Trak Employment Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400025/2022
- Decision date
- 25 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Danvers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Silveira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol video hearing on 21 October 2022, Employment Judge Danvers dismissed Mr F Silveira's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract against Trak Employment Solutions Limited. The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented within the relevant three-month period, and that they were not presented within such further period as was reasonable.
On that basis, the tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims. The judgment records no determination of the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the relevant three-month period and that it was not presented within any further period that was reasonable; therefore there was no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on the same limitation/jurisdiction basis as the unlawful deductions claim: the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within three months and that it was not brought within any further reasonable period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.