Case 1400049/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Miss N Frost v Coffee Jazz Limited — 2025

Case reference: 1400049/2025
Decision date: 30 October 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cuthbert FINAL

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss N Frost

Respondent

Coffee Jazz Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the final hearing in Bristol by video on 10 October 2025, before Employment Judge Cuthbert, the tribunal upheld Miss N Frost's claim for unlawful deductions from wages. Coffee Jazz Limited was ordered to pay £296.82, subject to any deductions for income tax and national insurance.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars. Under section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, it made an additional award of two weeks' pay in the sum of £587.50. The monetary orders therefore total £884.32. The record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Ordered payable less any deductions for income tax and national insurance.	Upheld	—	£297
Other	Additional award of two weeks' pay under section 38(3) Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars.	Upheld	—	£588

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £884; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.