Case 1400063/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v In Person CONSENT — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400063/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment issued by Employment Judge Smail following a CVP audio hearing at Exeter on 13 February 2025. The Claimant, Mr M. Pharaoh, and the Respondents, Mr S. Lock and Mr A. Thomas trading as the New Inn Clovelly, both appeared in person and agreed terms of settlement.
Under the agreed terms, the Respondents must pay the Claimant £2,000 by way of four equal instalments of £500, payable on 1 April, 1 May, 1 June and 1 July 2025. In default of any one instalment, the outstanding balance becomes payable immediately and enforceable in the County Court.
Save for the agreed payment, all remaining claims are recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal made no findings of fact, applied no legal tests, and provided no reasoned analysis, as the matter was disposed of by consent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment: Respondents to pay Claimant £2,000 in four monthly £500 instalments (1 April, 1 May, 1 June, 1 July 2025). Remaining claims dismissed upon withdrawal. Specific claim type not itemised in the judgment; gov.uk listing categorised the case as unlawful deduction from wages. | Settled | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.