Case 1400071/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Upchurch v Eight Technology Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400071/2020
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Upchurch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms H Upchurch’s complaint of unfair dismissal. It had issued a letter dated 14 January 2020 giving her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing, because she had not complied with the tribunal’s order dated 21 January 2020 and the complaint had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. For that reason, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment then states that the claimant’s remaining claim(s) would proceed to a hearing, with notice to follow.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 14 January 2020, to make representations or request a hearing. The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with an order dated 21 January 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.