Case 1400080/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Bozena Wojciechowska v TOC Property Servicing Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1400080/2026
- Decision date
- 7 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Bozena Wojciechowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 15 January 2026. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Bax decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Bozena Wojciechowska’s wages and awarded £3,858 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,096 in damages, that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,644, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement, for which it awarded £1,096 gross. The total amount payable was £7,694.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted text renders the award as £3.858; the stated total of £7,694 confirms this is £3,858. | Upheld | — | £3,858 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,096 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,644 |
| Holiday pay | Award for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,096 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,694
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.