Case 1400083/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v C UK Realisations Ltd (In Administration) and The Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400083/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol on 13 September 2024 before Employment Judge Cadney sitting alone. The claimant did not attend, and there was no attendance for either respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims against the first and/or second respondent were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the claims.
No remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment. The decision was dated 16 September 2024 and sent to the parties on 30 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types. It records that the claimant did not attend the hearing and that the claimant’s claims against the first and/or second respondent were dismissed pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.