Case 1400098/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Philips v The Halsetown Inn Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400098/2020
- Decision date
- 10 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oliver Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Philips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss B Philips worked for The Halsetown Inn Ltd from 31 March to 18 October 2019 on variable hours. The Tribunal proceeded in the absence of both parties, taking the matter on the papers because the Claimant had explained her non-attendance and no one from the Respondent or the Liquidator intended to attend. The Respondent was in creditors' voluntary liquidation, and the Liquidator indicated there were insufficient funds to meet sums due above those recoverable through the Secretary of State.
The Tribunal accepted the Claimant's calculation that she had averaged 16.45 hours per week in the 12 weeks before the end of employment and had accrued 35.5 hours of holiday. Using an hourly rate of £8.50, the gross holiday pay due was £301.75. The Respondent had already paid £51 on 11 October and a further £35.83 on 4 November, leaving £214.92 unpaid.
The Respondent said in its ET3 that it had deducted an alleged outstanding bar bill of £197.10 from the final payment. The Tribunal did not have evidence to determine whether that sum was still owed or had been paid in cash, but it found that, even if the debt remained outstanding, the Respondent was not legally entitled to deduct it because there was no evidence of authorisation or prior written agreement. Applying Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, section 224 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal held that the failure to pay all holiday pay due amounted to an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The claim succeeded and the Respondent was ordered to pay £214.92 to the Claimant. The Tribunal noted that, because the Respondent was in liquidation, the Claimant could contact the Redundancy Payments Service and might be able to recover the sum from the Secretary of State.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Claimant sought unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment. The Tribunal found the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by not paying the full holiday pay due and ordered payment of £214.92. | Upheld | — | £215 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £215
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 224 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.