Case 1400113/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Nightingale Storage and Removals Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400113/2020
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with two matters. First, the claimant’s claim for £396.10 said to be owed in statutory maternity pay was not determined finally at this hearing: it was stayed pending referral to the HMRC Statutory Payments Disputes Team. The tribunal stated that, unless the claimant restored the claim, it would be dismissed on 30 July 2021, and that if it were restored she would need to identify the cause of action giving the Employment Tribunal jurisdiction over unpaid statutory maternity pay.
Second, the tribunal upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered the respondent to pay £1,387.77 within 14 days. The sum was calculated by reference to 19.6 days of holiday at 8.5 hours per day and £8.33 an hour, for the holiday year April 2019 to April 2020.
No other claims were pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for £396.10 alleged statutory maternity pay was stayed pending referral to the HMRC Statutory Payments Disputes Team. The tribunal said that unless the claimant restored it, the claim would be dismissed on 30 July 2021, and that if it were restored she would need to identify the jurisdictional cause of action for unpaid statutory maternity pay. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,387.77 holiday pay, described as 19.6 days at 8.5 hours per day at £8.33 an hour, for the holiday year April 2019 to April 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,388 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,388
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.