Case 1400116/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rockstone Public House Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400116/2019
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimants' breach of contract claims. It found that each claimant, Mr Greenwood and Mrs Greenwood, was entitled to £24,000.00 as a severance and/or redundancy payment from the respondent, Rockstone Public House Ltd. The judgment states that this payment included any entitlement to statutory or contractual redundancy pay, statutory or contractual notice pay, and any outstanding holiday pay, so no separate order was made for those heads of loss.
For avoidance of doubt, the tribunal set out the amounts that would have been payable had there been no breach. It recorded that Mr Greenwood's statutory redundancy payment would have been £2,769.24 and his 7 weeks' statutory notice pay £807.73, while Mrs Greenwood's statutory redundancy payment would have been £2,769.24 and her 7 weeks' statutory notice pay £1,291.99. The remaining claims for holiday pay and unpaid wages were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the claimants' breach of contract claims and ordered £24,000.00 to each claimant, making £48,000.00 in total. It recorded that the severance payment included any entitlement to statutory or contractual redundancy pay, statutory or contractual notice pay, and any outstanding holiday pay, so no separate orders were made for those items. | Upheld | — | £48,000 |
| Holiday pay | The remaining claim for holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The remaining claim for unpaid wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £48,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.