Case 1400124/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Skells v Agincare (Somerset) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400124/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Skells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 9 August 2019 before Employment Judge Reed sitting alone in Southampton, the parties informed the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed. The claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by its HR Manager, Ms A Crabb.
By consent, the tribunal postponed the hearing. The written record states that unless either party applied within 28 days for the matter to be restored, the claim would be treated for all purposes and without further order as dismissed on withdrawal. No merits findings or remedy assessment were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment is a consent settlement record and does not set out the pleaded issue in detail; the claim type is taken from the gov.uk case listing. The order states that terms of settlement had been agreed and that, unless restored within 28 days, the claim would be treated as dismissed on withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is a consent settlement record and does not set out the pleaded issue in detail; the claim type is taken from the gov.uk case listing. The order states that terms of settlement had been agreed and that, unless restored within 28 days, the claim would be treated as dismissed on withdrawal. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.