Case 1400124/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Collings v Clocks & Barrels Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400124/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Collings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Collings' claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The appendix set out the calculation by reference to an hourly rate of £12.50 and three pay dates: 25 November 2021, 2 December 2021 and 9 December 2021. It recorded shortfalls of £102.11 net, £177.70 gross, £102.99 net and £138.08 gross, and then credited £272 net for a payment made by the respondent on 13 March 2023.
The holiday pay claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal because the sum had been paid by the respondent. The summary order therefore left the respondent liable only for the unlawful deductions calculation, producing a net total of £248.88.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The appendix calculated the shortfall by reference to an hourly rate of £12.50 across pay dates 25/11/21, 02/12/21 and 09/12/21. It set out amounts A-D and credited £272 net paid by the respondent on 13 March 2023, leaving a net total of £248.88. | Upheld | — | £249 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant withdrew this claim. The judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal because the sum had been paid by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £249
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.