Case 1400140/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Linzell (father) v Mr Adam Jackson (Consultant) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400140/2025
- Decision date
- 12 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Linzell (father)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Exeter, before Employment Judge Smail, considered the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings on 22 August 2025. The judgment records that the claimant was Mr A. Linzell and the respondent was TBPG Limited, with Mr Adam Jackson appearing for the respondent and Mr Paul Linzell appearing for the claimant.
The tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £288.10 forthwith in respect of work performed. No separate findings, legal tests, or additional remedies are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the claim as one for unauthorised deductions from earnings and found it well-founded. | Upheld | — | £288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £288
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.