Case 1400143/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hinton v Eco Home Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400143/2019
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Havant
- Panel members
- Mr P Bompas, Mr P Flanagan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hinton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Havant on 1 December 2020 before Employment Judge Dawson, with Mr P Bompas and Mr P Flanagan as the lay members. The claimant, Mr M Hinton, was not in attendance. The respondent, Eco Home Group Limited, was represented by Mr Henry.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application for an adjournment of the hearing. It then dismissed the claimant's claims. The written record does not set out the detailed factual basis of the claims or any substantive reasoning beyond the outcome.
The judgment records that the respondent's name was changed to Eco Home Group Limited. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the written record. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the published decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The written record only states that the claimant's claims were dismissed; the tribunal judgment itself does not set out the underlying particulars of the claim. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.