Case 1400144/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr LP Rostron v Bristol Waste Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400144/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
- Panel members
- Mr Launder, Dr Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr LP Rostron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Bristol heard the case on 12 and 13 February 2020 before Employment Judge Livesey, Mr Launder and Dr Miller. The only claim identified in the written judgment was a claim of discrimination on the grounds of disability brought by Mr L Rostron against Bristol Waste Company Limited.
The tribunal dismissed that disability discrimination claim. The written record does not set out the tribunal's factual reasoning because it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the written judgment, and no award is set out against the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's disability discrimination claim was dismissed. No further reasoning or remedy is set out in the written record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.