Case 1400145/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Chant v AND Complete Protect Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400145/2024
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Chant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined in chambers under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The claimant, Mr C Chant, brought claims against Complete Protect Limited for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim and ordered the respondent to pay one week’s notice pay in the net sum of £543.67. It also upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay five weeks’ pay in the gross sum of £3,365.40.
The judgment does not record any additional factual findings beyond the Rule 21 basis for determination or any separate award components beyond those two sums. The total monetary liability recorded by the judgment is £3,909.07.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claim succeeded under Rule 21 and ordered one week’s notice pay in the net sum of £543.67. | Upheld | — | £544 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim succeeded under Rule 21 and ordered five weeks’ pay in the gross sum of £3,365.40. | Upheld | — | £3,365 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,909
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.