Case 1400150/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Teresa Benneworth v AND Yay! Group UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400150/2023
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Teresa Benneworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat remotely by CVP on 24 May 2023 and proceeded under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The tribunal identified Yay! Group UK Limited as the correct respondent and dismissed Mr Tony Searle and Yay Group Limited as respondents to the proceedings.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,046.99. The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £493.99.
The judgment records no separate remedy breakdown beyond those two sums. The total of the monetary awards is £1,540.98.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,046.99 for the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,047 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £493.99 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £494 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,541
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.