Case 1400151/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Harriett Shrimpton v AND Yay! Group UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400151/2023
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Harriett Shrimpton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal heard the matter remotely on 24 May 2023 and proceeded under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. The judgment records that the claimant’s former employer and the correct respondent was Yay! Group UK Limited, and it dismissed Mr Tony Searle and Yay Group Limited as respondents to the proceedings.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages and ordered Yay! Group UK Limited to pay the gross sum of £1,917.02. It also upheld the claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £266.00.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other compensation findings are recorded in the judgment. The total monetary award reflected in the order is £2,183.02 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,917.02. | Upheld | — | £1,917 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £266.00. | Upheld | — | £266 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,183
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.