Case 1400159/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rogers v Colten Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400159/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Claimant’s claims for arrears of pay, holiday, notice and age discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No findings on the merits of those claims are set out in the text provided, and no remedy was awarded in relation to them.
The judgment also records that the Claimant’s remaining claim of unfair dismissal would proceed to a hearing on 19, 20 and 21 July 2021 before an Employment Judge sitting alone. This document is therefore a procedural judgment disposing of the withdrawn claims and listing the remaining unfair dismissal claim for hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described in the judgment as a claim for arrears of pay; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim described in the judgment as a holiday claim; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim described in the judgment as a notice claim; dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Age discrimination claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.