Case 1400165/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v - Ms S-J Wood — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400165/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard joined claims by Mr C Johnson, Mr C Pender and Ms S Radovanovic against QERB Energy Ltd, a green energy provider. The main issue was unpaid commission on ECO3 and Green Homes Grant sales. The tribunal found there was no express contractual commission term, and considered whether commission had become contractual by custom and practice.
It accepted evidence that the respondent suffered a downturn in work, had significant sums owed to it, suffered clawbacks, and ceased trading at the end of October 2021. Although the claimants had previously received commission payments, the tribunal held that this did not make commission a contractual entitlement in the circumstances in the summer of 2021. Applying the test for implication by custom and practice, it held the term was not shown to be reasonable, notorious and certain. All unpaid commission claims were dismissed.
For Mr Johnson and Mr Pender, the tribunal found that neither had received notice of termination before 31 October 2021. Their notice pay claims were therefore upheld in the sums of £1,848.00 and £1,750.00 respectively. Mr Johnson's redundancy pay and holiday pay claims were conceded by the respondent and were entered by consent at £1,386.00 and £1,524.60.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr C Johnson; unpaid commission claim dismissed because the tribunal found no contractual entitlement could be implied by custom and practice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mr C Johnson; unpaid notice pay upheld at £1,848.00 after the tribunal found no notice of termination had been received before 31 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,848 |
| Redundancy | Mr C Johnson; redundancy pay entered by consent at £1,386.00. | Upheld | — | £1,386 |
| Holiday pay | Mr C Johnson; holiday pay entered by consent at £1,524.60. | Upheld | — | £1,525 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr C Pender; unpaid commission claim dismissed because the tribunal found no contractual entitlement could be implied by custom and practice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mr C Pender; unpaid notice pay upheld at £1,750.00 after the tribunal found no notice of termination had been received before 31 October 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,509
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonable, notorious and certain
- custom and practice
- Duke v Reliance Systems Ltd 1982 ICR 449
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.